Under the 2024 Regulation 1.25 amendments, what dollar-weighted average maturity standard applies to the overall portfolio of customer segregated funds, and which investment types are excluded from that calculation?
The model reproduced the 24-month ceiling correctly but appended a cross-regulatory methodology reference — SEC Rule 2a-7's WAM computation standard — that does not appear in the CFTC rule. This is a training-side cross-contamination: SEC Rule 2a-7's WAM methodology is a highly prominent concept in money market fund regulation, and the model appears to have grafted it onto the CFTC's maturity limit as a plausible-sounding elaboration. The CFTC rule specifies its own computation scope via exclusions; it does not incorporate 2a-7 by reference.
This finding implicates cross-regulator concept conflation in the training data. The model correctly retrieved the 24-month WAM ceiling but appended SEC Rule 2a-7's computation methodology as an elaboration — a cross-contamination that occurs when two regulators' frameworks share vocabulary and are trained in close proximity without independence annotations. The error is in the generation layer: the model added a plausible-sounding methodology reference not present in the retrieved CFTC rule text.
An accountant reviewing an FCM's portfolio maturity analysis who does not independently verify the exclusion clause will apply the 24-month dollar-weighted average maturity limit to the full portfolio — including instruments the rule explicitly excludes. The practical effect is a stricter-than-required constraint on the portfolio, or a failure to catch a client's calculation error if the client has correctly applied the exclusion but the accountant has not. In either case the sign-off on the analysis is based on an incomplete reading of the rule, which becomes a liability issue if the engagement is later scrutinised.
Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#2 — Dollar-weighted average maturity — excluded instrument types — Practitioners — Accountants (CA/PA)." Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-Q002. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-04. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-dco-customer-funds-investments-reg-1-25-2024/practitioners/accountants-ca-pa/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-v1-002/
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#2 — Dollar-weighted average maturity — excluded instrument types [Hallucination finding RLB-F-US-CFTC-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-Q002]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-dco-customer-funds-investments-reg-1-25-2024/practitioners/accountants-ca-pa/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-v1-002/
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#2 — Dollar-weighted average maturity — excluded instrument types [RLB-F-US-CFTC-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-Q002], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 04, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-dco-customer-funds-investments-reg-1-25-2024/practitioners/accountants-ca-pa/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-v1-002/.
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_US_CFTC_FCM_DCO_CUSTOMER_FUNDS_INVESTMENTS_REG_1_25_2024_Q002,
author = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
title = {Finding#2 — Dollar-weighted average maturity — excluded instrument types},
year = {2026},
publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
note = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-Q002},
url = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-dco-customer-funds-investments-reg-1-25-2024/practitioners/accountants-ca-pa/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-DCO-CUSTOMER-FUNDS-INVESTMENTS-REG-1-25-2024-v1-002/}
}