AI Hallucination Research › Audiences › Practitioners › International / Multilateral › Public Auditors › Detail › Finding
Practitioners — Public Auditors · updated 2026-05-30
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

Finding#1 — CCP resilience consultative report — verbatim access gap

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023
AI's failure:Blind Spot Risk for Public Auditors:Wrong deliverable
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#1 — CCP resilience consultative report — verbatim access gap

Impact for Public Auditors in international jurisdictions advising on the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI)

Public Auditors conducting CCP resilience or recovery assessments often need to cite specific provisions, quantitative thresholds, and cross-references from the August 2016 CPMI-IOSCO consultative report. When AI tools cannot supply that verbatim content, an auditor who relies on AI-generated text risks embedding unverified paraphrases into workpapers or client deliverables. The client FMI loses the assurance that the auditor's findings are anchored in the operative regulatory language, and the audit firm carries the professional risk of issuing conclusions that do not accurately reflect what the document says.

Next finding → Finding#2 — 2025 Level 3 general business risk assessment — post-cutoff blind spot
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023
Plain text Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#1 — CCP resilience consultative report — verbatim access gap — Practitioners — Public Auditors." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-05-30. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/
APA 7th edition Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#1 — CCP resilience consultative report — verbatim access gap [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#1 — CCP resilience consultative report — verbatim access gap [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (May 30, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/.
BibTeX Download 
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_PFMI_2012_Q023,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#1 — CCP resilience consultative report — verbatim access gap},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →
About Citation IDs →