AI Hallucination Research › Regulators › Major advanced economies › GB › FCA › CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9 › White paper › Detail › Finding
AI Labs · updated 2026-05-26 · methodology v2.1

Finding on 'Q005 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q005-Opus47
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding on 'Q005 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON

  • Question (paraphrased to protect IP): Does the Consumer Duty apply to micro-enterprises or small charities? Are they 'retail customers' under PRIN 2A?
  • AI's response: > "charities with annual income under £1 million"
  • Regulator's text: Retail customer includes consumers (individual persons), micro-enterprises, and charities with annual turnover less than £1 million. Definition varies by sourcebook.
  • Why the AI went wrong: The FCA's definition uses "annual turnover" as the threshold measure for charities. The model substituted "annual income" — a different financial metric that would produce different results in practice for charities that have income sources distinct from trading turnover. This is a precise definitional substitution: the word swap is small but changes which charities fall within scope, and reflects the model applying a common synonym rather than retrieving the regulator's exact defined term.
  • Cited source(s):
  • https://handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/PRIN/2A/1.html — Pretextual
  • https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/finalised-guidance/fg22-5.pdf — Pretextual
  • Regulator portal (if any cited link is dud): https://www.fca.org.uk
Impact for this audience

This finding is a precise defined-term substitution: 'annual income' for 'annual turnover'. This implicates the model's lexical handling of regulatory definitions — specifically, whether its training corpus contained the exact FCA definition or a paraphrase. The fact that web search did not surface the correct term suggests either the retrieval step did not reach the Handbook definition, or the model did not use the retrieved content to override its training inference. A targeted eval checking exact regulatory defined terms (particularly financial thresholds with close synonyms) would catch this class of error.

References — raw findings (per AI model)
← Previous finding Finding on 'Q003 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON Next finding → Finding on 'Q008 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q005-Opus47
Plain text Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding on 'Q005 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q005-Opus47. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-05-26. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/fca/consumer-duty-ps22-9/whitepaper/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-005--opus-47-websearch/
APA 7th edition Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding on 'Q005 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [Hallucination finding RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q005-Opus47]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/fca/consumer-duty-ps22-9/whitepaper/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-005--opus-47-websearch/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding on 'Q005 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q005-Opus47], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (May 26, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/fca/consumer-duty-ps22-9/whitepaper/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-005--opus-47-websearch/.
BibTeX Download 
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_GB_FCA_CONSUMER_DUTY_PS22_9_Q005_Opus47,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding on 'Q005 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q005-Opus47},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/fca/consumer-duty-ps22-9/whitepaper/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-005--opus-47-websearch/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →
About Citation IDs →