AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesSectorsInternational / MultilateralPayment InstitutionsGovernance & Company Secretarial › Implementation Monitoring of the PFMI: Level 3 Assessment on General Business Risks
Payment Institutions × Governance & Company Secretarial — International / Multilateral · updated 2026-06-03 · methodology v2.3
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

AI on Implementation Monitoring of the PFMI: Level 3 Assessment on General Business Risks for Governance & Company Secretarial teams at Payment Institutions firms in international jurisdictions

This is the consolidated view of findings. Click the Citation IDs or 'see details →' on any item for the full details for each finding.

  1. Assessment timeline truncated — 2023–24 stated, 2023–25 correct
    RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-Q005

    When a Governance & Company Secretarial team at a Payment Institution uses AI to draft a methodology note on this assessment, the AI described the assessment as running during 2023–24 — directly contradicted by the published BIS report, which records FMI engagement continuing to April 2025. A board paper, regulatory submission, or internal audit file produced from that AI output would carry a verifiably wrong end-date into the firm's formal record. For a Payment Institution operating internationally, that error can surface simultaneously in multiple regulatory jurisdictions, each of which has access to the BIS publication and can identify the discrepancy.

    The immediate remediation cost is a corrected document and an explanation; the reputational cost is a governance function that was caught characterising a major BIS assessment inaccurately in formal materials.

    see details →