This is the consolidated view of findings. Click the Citation IDs or 'see details →' on any item for the full details for each finding.
When a Company Secretary uses AI to draft a methodology note characterising the CPMI-IOSCO Level 3 assessment, the AI's account of when the assessment ran is wrong: it describes a 2023–2024 window rather than the full 2023–2025 lifecycle confirmed in the primary publication. The error directly misrepresents the procedural scope of the assessment — including the findings-sharing and validation phase that ran through April 2025 — and any board pack, regulatory engagement summary, or counterparty disclosure built on that draft will carry a factual inaccuracy about a BIS supervisory process.
For Company Secretaries in international jurisdictions, where procedural representations in governance documentation carry sign-off weight, this is the category of error that surfaces in audit review or counterparty challenge rather than internal drafting — by which point correction is costly.