AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesPractitionersInternational / MultilateralCompany Secretaries › Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI)
Practitioners — Company Secretaries · updated 2026-05-30 · methodology v2.3
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

AI on Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI) for Company Secretaries in international jurisdictions

This is the consolidated view of findings. Click the Citation IDs or 'see details →' on any item for the full details for each finding.

  1. PFMI Principle 2 board risk committee — mandatory or conditional?
    RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q022

    A Company Secretary who relies on this AI response may draft board committee terms of reference, or sign off on a PFMI self-assessment, on the basis that a specific numbered sub-provision imposes (or does not impose) a hard requirement to establish a risk committee — when no such sub-provision exists in the form cited. If the error enters a board governance framework at an FMI operating across multiple jurisdictions, it is likely to be replicated in subsidiary charters and regional board templates before anyone verifies the underlying source.

    The consequence ranges from a governance framework that is non-compliant with the actual PFMI standard, to advice to a board that it has satisfied an obligation it has not in fact met — or, conversely, that it has an obligation it does not. Either version of the error carries reputational and regulatory exposure for the Company Secretary and the entity they advise.

    see details →