A compliance analyst asks which of the 10 CPMI API harmonisation recommendations specifically target commercial banks or correspondent banking institutions, which target payment system operators, which target central banks or regulators, and which target standards bodies—seeking a recommendation-by-recommendation stakeholder breakdown.
With no retrievable per-recommendation content, the model inferred stakeholder assignments from the recommendation category names and its knowledge of how standards-body governance typically works — BIAN, ISO, and SWIFT appear as plausible assignments to a harmonisation-processes category without any retrieved basis. The model presented this inference as a stakeholder breakdown, not as a reasoned extrapolation from category names.
Domain inference used as a stakeholder-assignment mechanism — assigning ISO, BIAN, and SWIFT to a harmonisation-processes category by structural reasoning — is not retrieval. The training data for this document appears to lack per-recommendation content, and the model's self-check did not flag that its output was constructed rather than retrieved. The RAG glue layer is not enforcing a 'content was found' gate before allowing domain-inference fill.
When asked to produce a recommendation-by-recommendation stakeholder breakdown across the 10 CPMI API harmonisation recommendations — identifying which target commercial banks, which target payment system operators, which target central banks, and which target standards bodies — an AI assistant produced confident category-level assignments that went beyond any accessible source and then retracted them under challenge, admitting it did not have a reliable basis for the breakdown.
For a Corporate Banking Legal team building an internal compliance architecture or supplier obligation matrix for cross-border payment products, an AI-generated stakeholder map treated as authoritative produces structurally wrong obligation assignments: the firm may mis-scope its own direct obligations, fail to impose the correct API standards on counterparties in connectivity agreements, or present an inaccurate regulatory position to internal audit or external regulators.
Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#2 — Stakeholder map fabricated then retracted — Corporate Banking × Legal — International / Multilateral." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q008. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-04. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-api-harmonisation-cross-border-2024/sectors/corporate_banking/legal/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-008/
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#2 — Stakeholder map fabricated then retracted [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q008]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-api-harmonisation-cross-border-2024/sectors/corporate_banking/legal/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-008/
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#2 — Stakeholder map fabricated then retracted [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q008], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 04, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-api-harmonisation-cross-border-2024/sectors/corporate_banking/legal/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-008/.
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_API_HARMONISATION_CROSS_BORDER_2024_Q008,
author = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
title = {Finding#2 — Stakeholder map fabricated then retracted},
year = {2026},
publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
note = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q008},
url = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-api-harmonisation-cross-border-2024/sectors/corporate_banking/legal/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-008/}
}