AI Hallucination Research › Audiences › Practitioners › International / Multilateral › Public Auditors › Detail › Finding
Practitioners — Public Auditors · updated 2026-05-30
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

Finding#3 — IOSCO co-published PFMI text — binary PDF inaccessible

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026
AI's failure:Blind Spot Risk for Public Auditors:Wrong deliverable
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#3 — IOSCO co-published PFMI text — binary PDF inaccessible

Impact for Public Auditors in international jurisdictions advising on the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI)

Where the operative document for an international FMI assessment is the IOSCO co-published version of the PFMI (IOSCOPD377) rather than the BIS edition, auditors must retrieve and cite that specific publication. AI tools cannot provide verbatim text from the IOSCOPD377 PDF binary, meaning any provision or cross-reference the AI supplies cannot be treated as verified against the document the regulator designates as authoritative. An audit opinion that cites language from an unverified source — even if the language is substantively identical to the BIS version — creates an evidentiary gap in the audit file.

← Previous finding Finding#2 — 2025 Level 3 general business risk assessment — post-cutoff blind spot Next finding → Finding#4 — IOSCO disclosure framework and assessment methodology — verbatim access gap
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026
Plain text Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#3 — IOSCO co-published PFMI text — binary PDF inaccessible — Practitioners — Public Auditors." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-05-30. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/
APA 7th edition Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#3 — IOSCO co-published PFMI text — binary PDF inaccessible [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#3 — IOSCO co-published PFMI text — binary PDF inaccessible [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (May 30, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/.
BibTeX Download 
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_PFMI_2012_Q026,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#3 — IOSCO co-published PFMI text — binary PDF inaccessible},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/public-auditors/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →
About Citation IDs →