AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesPractitionersInternational / MultilateralLawyersDetail › Finding
Practitioners — Lawyers · updated 2026-05-29
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

Finding#6 — IOSCO co-published PFMI — verbatim content inaccessible

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026
AI's failure:Blind Spot Risk for Lawyers:Liability / PI exposure
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#6 — IOSCO co-published PFMI — verbatim content inaccessible

Impact for Lawyers in international jurisdictions advising on the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI)

Both AI tools correctly declined to supply verbatim text from the IOSCO co-published version of the PFMI (IOSCOPD377), noting that the binary PDF was not accessible at paragraph level. In practice the IOSCO version carries the same substantive content as the BIS publication, but for lawyers advising IOSCO-regulated entities or filing documents with IOSCO-member regulators who reference the IOSCO-published version as the applicable instrument, the inability of AI tools to retrieve its precise text creates a gap that must be filled by direct document review.

Advice or submissions that paraphrase rather than accurately quote the applicable instrument carry regulatory and professional risk.

← Previous finding Finding#5 — Stablecoin guidance press release (Jul 2022) — verbatim content inaccessible Next finding → Finding#7 — IOSCO disclosure framework and assessment methodology — verbatim content inaccessible
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#6 — IOSCO co-published PFMI — verbatim content inaccessible [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (May 29, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/.
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#6 — IOSCO co-published PFMI — verbatim content inaccessible — Practitioners — Lawyers." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-05-29. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#6 — IOSCO co-published PFMI — verbatim content inaccessible [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_PFMI_2012_Q026,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#6 — IOSCO co-published PFMI — verbatim content inaccessible},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q026},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-026/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →