AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesPractitionersInternational / MultilateralLawyersDetail › Finding
Practitioners — Lawyers · updated 2026-05-29
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

Finding#3 — CCP resilience report (Aug 2016) — verbatim content inaccessible

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023
AI's failure:Blind Spot Risk for Lawyers:Liability / PI exposure
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#3 — CCP resilience report (Aug 2016) — verbatim content inaccessible

Impact for Lawyers in international jurisdictions advising on the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI)

Two AI tools tested on the August 2016 CPMI-IOSCO consultative report on CCP resilience and recovery both correctly acknowledged they could not retrieve verbatim text, specific thresholds, or paragraph cross-references from the document. For a lawyer advising on CCP recovery planning, stress-testing obligations, or loss allocation rules in any PFMI-implementing jurisdiction, this means AI tools cannot supply the actual regulatory language that would need to appear in a legal work product — the source document must be obtained and read directly.

The Pretextual citation label on the BIS URL indicates the AI directed the lawyer to the document without being able to verify its content.

Next finding → Finding#4 — Level 3 general business risk assessment (Nov 2025) — verbatim content inaccessible
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#3 — CCP resilience report (Aug 2016) — verbatim content inaccessible [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (May 29, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/.
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#3 — CCP resilience report (Aug 2016) — verbatim content inaccessible — Practitioners — Lawyers." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-05-29. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#3 — CCP resilience report (Aug 2016) — verbatim content inaccessible [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_PFMI_2012_Q023,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#3 — CCP resilience report (Aug 2016) — verbatim content inaccessible},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q023},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-023/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →